

|
Co-Producer, A Sea Change |
Owner, Flying Fish Restaurant |
UW Climate Impacts Group |
||||||||
|
Director of Resource Management, Puget Sound Anglers |
Senior Fishery Management Biologist, Tulalip Tribes |
Director, Fish Program, WDFW |
Sven Huseby (Bio)
Co-Producer, A Sea Change ![]()
Salmon recovery remains critical from my point of view. After spending the last two years speaking with ocean scientists and fisheries specialists, while making the film A Sea Change, I have come to the conclusion that fish are currently confronted with an environmental "perfect storm." They have to struggle with warming waters, pollution, industrial fishing practices and now, ocean acidification. While many refer to ocean acidification as the "game ender", I think that we must work hard to protect and strengthen individual fish species as fully as possible so that they are best prepared to meet the short term challenges as we work to do the right thing and decrease CO2 emissions and thereby slow and finally stop the increases in ocean acidity.
While I fear that our time window for effective action is getting rapidly smaller, we now need new aggressive changes to our federal energy and climate change policies, laws, and regulations; we have to participate in setting emission targets at the UN Climate Change Conference in December; and we have to move our economy onto a sustainable energy platform. While this is happening, salmon must be kept as healthy and strong as possible because they will inevitably feel the stresses of the environmental costs that we have created by choosing to fuel modern life with energy derived from the combustion of fossil fuels. Our modern era has created a huge carbon debt and finally, we are beginning to understand that that debt is being called.
Read Sven's bioSven Huseby
Co-Producer, A Sea Change ![]()
Sven is Co-Producer of the documentary film, A Sea Change (2008). He is a retired independent school head who worked as a teacher and administrator at The Putney School for 30 years. He remains involved with non-profits to build organizational capacity and to plan for the long term. He has a B.A. in history from Yale.
Born in Norway, Sven Huseby's parents owned a fish market. After World War II, his father worked in a salmon cannery in a remote native village situated on an Alaskan fjord. Moving in the 1950s to the cultural security of Seattle, Sven spoke Norwegian in his neighborhood while developing his English at school, eating fish six days a week. He became the first in his family to attend college after admission to Yale.
In his film, A Sea Change, Sven documents the awakening of his environmental consciousness and the threats to his cultural identity. Revisiting the places where he grew up, he witnesses the cultural, economic and ecological changes already underway and assesses the problems that ocean acidification might hold for future generations. New questions haunt him: How will he explain to his oldest grandchild, Elias, what is happening to the oceans and their ecosystems? How will he teach Elias the traditions of his family, and their historic dependence on the sea? How will he help him look into a changing and uncertain future? What can each of us do to avoid contributing to a crisis threatening future generations?
Driven by these concerns, Sven embarks on an odyssey that leads him to small fishing villages whose cash crop is at risk, native communities whose way of life is being threatened, activists working to combat the crisis, and individuals who are changing their lifestyles to make a difference at the most local level.
Go back to Sven's Roundtable responseChef Chris Keff (Bio)
Owner, Flying Fish Restaurant ![]()
Even though the things we do to preserve our salmon culture here may seem like a small gesture, a tear in the ocean, in the face of overwhelming challenges like climate change, it is certainly a gesture worth making. Simply put, the salmon deserve our help. They deserve every effort we can make on their behalf; they did not ask for these difficulties and they are powerless to help themselves. So we will make the gesture, even if that's all it is. And we will be better for having made it.
Chef Chris Keff
Owner, Flying Fish Restaurant ![]()
Chris was Chef at Seattle's McCormick & Schmick’s and The Hunt Club before opening Flying Fish in 1995. Nearly 15 years later, she remains committed to simply prepared, locally-sourced seafood, and has additionally turned her interests to sustainable agriculture and organic farming. The Flying Fish menu states “All of our raw ingredients are organic or harvested from the wild.”
Chris and Flying Fish have received many accolades, including: James Beard Award / Best Chef Northwest and Hawaii, Robert Mondavi Culinary Award of Excellence, Wine Spectator Award of Excellence, Organic Style Magazine Green Cuisine Award. In 2006, Flying Fish was voted “Best of Citysearch” and was recognized the same year with the Sante Magazine Grand Award for Culinary Hospitality Restaurant of the Year.
From www.flyingfishrestaurant.com: “The idea for Flying Fish was born on a beach in Thailand. While traveling there I stopped for awhile on Koh Samui, an island in the Gulf of Thailand. There were several beach restaurants that served the catch-of-the-day simply grilled at tables perched in the sand on the water's edge. You could pick your fish out of the ice and it would reappear half an hour later in cooked form. It was so direct and so simple. It just seemed like a good idea.”
Go back to Chris's Roundtable responseDr. Nathan Mantua (Bio)
UW Climate Impacts Group ![]()
Salmon and steelhead in the Pacific Northwest are now in serious trouble because two things – abundance and diversity – in both habitat and fish populations are now mere shadows of what they were just 150 years ago.
I have no doubts that climate change and ocean acidification pose major threats to salmon and steelhead habitats, but I also think that in at least the next few decades those threats pale when compared to threats posed by the massive depletion and simplification of salmon and steelhead populations and habitats that’s taken place in the past century.
Habitat restoration, along with serious hatchery reform and careful harvest management, offers us great opportunities to turn back the clock to a time when diverse, dynamic and abundant habitat supported productive and diverse salmon and steelhead populations. I believe that we have no other choice if we want to have abundant and robust salmon populations in the future, no matter what happens with our climate.
Read Nate's bioDr. Nathan Mantua
UW Climate Impacts Group ![]()
Nate's current research focuses on climate impacts on water resources and aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, and how climate information is or isn’t being used in resource management decisions. He received a BS from the University of California at Davis in 1988, and a PhD from the UW’s Department of Atmospheric Science in 1994. He was a postdoctoral Fellow at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in 1994-95, and started his current position with the Climate Impacts Group in the fall of 1995.
In April 2000 Nate received a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers for his climate impacts research and public outreach activities. He has served on the US Global Oceans Ecosystems Dynamics (US GLOBEC) scientific steering committee, the National Research Council panel on the Alaska Groundfish Fishery and Stellar Sea Lions, and on the North Pacific Marine Science (PICES) panel on Fisheries and Ecosystem Response to Recent Regime Shifts.
Go back to Nate's Roundtable responseClint Muns (Bio)
Director of Resource Management, Puget Sound Anglers ![]()
Salmon have existed for millions of years. They have survived numerous geological events we would consider catastrophic. In geologic terms, this happened at a pace salmon were able to cope with. Human population growth and development are occurring at a pace that has created situations the salmon are struggling to overcome. If salmon are to continue to exist in any significant numbers it is incumbent on us to change our behavior and impacts on their environment. Salmon will survive given the chance.
Current recovery efforts are less than adequate, but are a start. A start to implementing the physical changes but also a start to educating society that there are ways we can coexist with salmon and our natural environment.
One step at a time…each individually…together a journey. Effort is paramount to success. We must make the effort. Success brings reward-failure will diminish us.
Read Clint's bioClint Muns
Director of Resource Management, Puget Sound Anglers ![]()
Clint is the Director of Resource Management for the sport-fishing association Puget Sound Anglers (PSA). He is the recent past president of the State board of PSA, and he founded the South Sound chapter.
PSA is dedicated to preserving quality fisheries, based on these principles: 1) Recreational fishing is an important part of NW culture and way of life, 2) fisheries should be managed for conservation of the resource first and secondly to provide quality, sustainable recreational fisheries, 3) fisheries laws, rules and agreements should be fully enforced, and 4) Hatchery Reform is critical to sustainable fisheries.
Clint is Chairman of the Puget Sound Recreational Fisheries Enhancement Oversight Committee, a member of the Hatchery Reform Coalition, and he participates in the North of Falcon season setting process for Puget Sound salmon fisheries. He serves as the Vice Chair of the Washington chapter of the Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA), a 501c4 political advocacy organization for recreational fishing. He is a member of the WDFW Recreational Fisheries Planning Cabinet, an advisory panel appointed by (former) Director Koenings to help the Department move forward with marked selective fisheries.
Go back to Clint's Roundtable responseKit Rawson (Bio)
Senior Fishery Management Biologist, Tulalip Tribes ![]()
The goal of salmon recovery is to restore and protect the natural processes and habitats necessary to support the abundance, productivity, diversity, and spatial structure of natural populations at robust levels.
Such viable natural salmon populations are resilient to environmental perturbations like climate change and ocean acidification. In contrast, hatchery production that is currently relied on to provide harvest and other benefits is not resilient to environmental change.
Recently this has been vividly demonstrated by the crash of the hatchery-dependent Sacramento River fall Chinook. An expert panel convened by the Pacific Fishery Management Council concluded that this crash would have been much less severe had these fish been supported by healthy natural processes rather than just four hatcheries.
So, the reality of climate change and ocean acidification does not make salmon recovery efforts moot. Rather, it makes them more necessary and critically important as a means to adapt to these threats.
Read Kit's bioKit Rawson
Senior Fishery Management Biologist, Tulalip Tribes ![]()
Kit has been a biometrician and fisheries management biologist for nearly 30 years in Alaska and Washington State. Since 1986 he has been responsible for salmon stock assessment and monitoring, enhancement planning, development of harvest management plans, and coordination of management with other tribal managers, the State of Washington, and others for the Tulalip Tribes.
He was a member of the Pacific Fishery Management Council's Scientific and Statistical Committee (1991-1998), including a term as Chair of the salmon subcommittee. Since 1998, he has been involved in developing the technical basis for salmon recovery plans for Puget Sound, especially focusing on the integrated effects of habitat, harvest, and hatchery management. He is a member of the Puget Sound Recovery Implementation Technical Team and is also chair of the San Juan County Marine Resources Committee.
Kit holds a B.S. in biological sciences from the University of Arizona and an M.S. in Biomathematics from the University of Washington.
Go back to Kit's Roundtable response
Problems facing salmon are the result of a century of anthropocentric stresses. We understand some of the biggest stresses on salmon, even as we are challenged by social and scientific issues associated with over-harvest, hatcheries, hydropower, and habitat degradation. Newer threats on the other hand, i.e., climate change and ocean acidification, are less well-understood, but will soon become problems in their own right and multipliers of existing problems facing salmon.
Salmon are primitive and resilient fish. They persisted through historic natural climate changes with varying sea levels and temperature regimes during and after Pleistocene glaciations. Although the current increasing rates of sea level rise and sea level temperature are unprecedented from the historical record, it would be premature to think that salmon cannot recover and adapt to changing climate conditions. Ocean acidification may have alarming trophic consequences for salmon as many of their preferred prey are very sensitive to changes in pH. However, the ocean has been more acidic in the distant past, and salmon may be capable of adapting to changes in the food web. Salmon have shown remarkable resiliency throughout time, and although rising sea levels, increasing sea surface temperature, and oceanic acidification appear daunting, the effects on salmon remain uncertain. To be sure, salmon stand to benefit from recovery efforts regardless of climate change and ocean acidification, and recovery efforts can only improve their ability to evolve with rapidly developing climate changes.
The value of ongoing salmon recovery efforts in the face of climate change is substantial. If salmon are a useful indicator of fresh water aquatic function, then efforts to recover salmon via habitat protection and restoration should translate into better, more resilient aquatic systems that benefit multiple species including humans. Salmon are aesthetically and culturally important. As long as we struggle to save salmon, salmon will continue to be one of the most compelling, local poster species for making climate change real to the skeptics and critics.
Read Jim's bioJim Scott
Director, Fish Program, WDFW ![]()
Jim holds a master's degree in Fisheries from the University of Washington and has worked in the field of salmon recovery for two decades. He joined the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Fish Program in 1999 as Chief Scientist.
His primary area of expertise is biometrics, including computer simulation and analytical models of biological systems. This expertise has been applied in a variety of applications in domestic and international forums. Jim served as co-chair of the Pacific Salmon Commission Chinook Technical Committee from 1991 through 2001, and was a technical advisor for the renegotiation of the Pacific Salmon Treaty in 1999.
Jim's work has focused on developing procedures to evaluate the risks and benefits of artificial production and developing recovery plans for listed species of salmonids. As manager of the Science Division, he had the responsibility of assuring that the production and management of fish resources by WDFW was grounded on a sound scientific basis.
Go back to Jim's Roundtable responseAbout the LLTK Roundtable
At LLTK, we routinely call upon the expertise of independent scientists, tribal and agency staff, teachers, activists, fishers, and community leaders to inspire and inform our work. The LLTK Roundtable, is an opportunity for you to enjoy the kind of access we do to inspiring leaders in salmon and steelhead recovery.
About the Participants
We'll continue to add voices to our Roundtable as the topics change. Participation in the LLTK Roundtable does not represent endorsement of all of our activities, but is critical to helping us shape them.
Suggest a Discussion Topic
Is there a topic you'd like the LLTK Roundtable to discuss?
- Send your idea to roundtable@lltk.org
