
Long Live the Kings has been working to recover threatened salmon and steelhead in Hood Canal since 1993. We have focused on using hatchery propagation to increase the abundance of wild fish populations where numbers have diminished to a trickle. While we are working hard and have seen success in rebuilding many of these populations, we realized early-on that the sustainability of Hood Canal salmon runs would require a comprehensive, holistic approach-one in which habitat, harvest, and hatchery efforts worked in harmony.
We are now engaged in several initiatives, with an array of partnering organizations, aimed at implementing a comprehensive recovery approach in Hood Canal. With relatively low human impacts, and habitat that is healthy enough to sustain larger salmon populations, Hood Canal represents a unique opportunity to drive real results and see real success in salmonid recovery.
But what will it take for these efforts to work? We posed that question and others to a specially-assembled LLTK Roundtable. Here's what they had to say.
Richard (Dick) Burge, Vice President of Conservation, Wild Steelhead Coalition; Phil Johnson, Commissioner, Jefferson County; Robert Masonis, Vice President for Western Conservation, Trout Unlimited; Joseph Pavel, Natural Resources Director, Skokomish Tribe; Larry Telles, Biologist and Member of the Pacific Region Hatchery Review Team, US Fish and Wildlife Service; Joy Waltermire, Steelhead Biologist, Long Live the Kings; Neil Werner, Executive Director, Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group;
Click here for a list of past and present Roundtable participants.
Update: Click here to join a public discussion about the topics covered in this edition of the LLTK Roundtable. Hosted by piscatorialpursuits.com.
What are the inherent challenges and opportunities of salmonid recovery in Hood Canal?
![]() |
Phil Johnson, Commissioner, Jefferson County: The biggest challenge that exists, from my point of view, lies in the need for comprehensive community education about salmon habitat and the human actions that affect it. Significant funding is needed to engage in outreach programs that inform landowners about the impacts of storm water runoff, culvert restriction, the use of nitrogen fertilizer, faulty septic and the acidification currently affecting our shellfish that is a threat to salmon as well. |
While I think that, in general, public awareness about these issues is growing, there remains a great need to continue expanding people’s knowledge. I think if we took a survey today asking Hood Canal property owners about their use of nitrogen fertilizer, for example, we’d be surprised to find out how many folks are still using it. We need to change people’s behavior, and education is fundamental to doing that.
I believe our biggest opportunity to save salmon is in preserving the healthy land and water that exists here, as in the Natural Preserve created in Tarboo Bay by the efforts of the Northwest Watershed Institute, The Nature Conservancy, and Jefferson Land Trust, with substantial support from the Jefferson County Commissioners and property owners. We need to work together to protect the Canal from the potential for industrialization, preserve it, and ensure that it is well-stewarded into the future.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Joseph Pavel, Natural Resources Director, Skokomish Tribe: A major challenge to salmonid recovery is to understand the nature and origin of detrimental or limiting impacts and to be able to provide a compelling argument for the appropriate remedial measures. In Hood Canal, where impacts originate from a range of influences as obvious as hydroelectric development to as subtle as the management of household pets, it is an ongoing effort to understand the pervasive influence of human activities on habitat quality and quantity and the population response of salmonid species. |
We have begun to understand the human influences upon the environment that have contributed to the decline of salmon, and have developed the opportunity to respond with appropriate recovery strategies. We must continue to reinforce that the recovery efforts that have been launched are just the beginning and that every person has the opportunity to contribute to habitat and population restoration efforts in large and small ways that will eventually make a difference.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Neil Werner, Executive Director, Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group: The inherent challenges we face today have changed little over the past twenty years, since our inception, other than what could be attributed to global warming. Loss of river habitat, water withdrawals, sediment loading, loss of marine habitat, loss of marine species, low dissolved oxygen, over-harvest are just some of the issues we deal with daily. Some are more prevalent than others, but all contribute to loss of salmonid numbers. These are the physical problems we face, but we also have those that are less obvious that bring us to the real crux of the problem; lack of understanding, lack of education, ambivalence and simple apathy of, and toward, these issues we struggle to solve. |
The same challenges also offer us new and innovative ways to solve these issues. Political forces have changed, at least in the near-term and the groundswell of public opinion is growing. Never have there been more funds available for salmon restoration and supplementation. It is just a little harder to get a hold of, but nonetheless it is there for those willing to work for it.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Larry Telles, Biologist and Member of the Pacific Region Hatchery Review Team, US Fish and Wildlife Service: The ongoing press of development along the shores of Hood Canal will continue to be a problem for salmonid recovery if local government does not incorporate protections in their management of land use. Fortunately, most local governments surrounding the Canal are sensitive to the impacts of land use and, for the most part, have been excellent stewards of those areas under their jurisdictions. |
This need to protect the watershed [also presents an opportunity, in that it] invites lively and productive discussion between disparate interest groups and encourages a seeking of common political ground between what would normally be unlikely cooperators.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Dick Burge, Vice President of Conservation, Wild Steelhead Coalition: The Wild Steelhead Coalition believes that a holistic vision of wild steelhead and salmon recovery in Hood Canal, and for other Western Washington waters, must include a pathway for all ecosystem components to recover toward historical levels. Working to restore the abundance of the badly depleted wild steelhead and salmon populations must include serious attention to their habitat problems. |
A chance for success in recovering Hood Canal salmon means starting with the watershed, estuaries and the migratory paths of wild fish and understanding what habitat changes, including water quality, have occurred in the last two centuries.
Habitat recovery and protection, and the elimination of segregated hatchery plantings, coupled with conservative fisheries management that addresses rebuilding the complete suite of the Viable Salmonid Population parameters (or VSP, defined as adequate abundance, diversity, productivity and distribution) provides the best chance of success for restoring wild steelhead and salmon in Hood Canal rivers.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Rob Masonis, Vice President for Western Conservation, Trout Unlimited: In contrast with most of the rivers that drain the Cascade Range and flow west into Puget Sound, most of the rivers along the eastern Olympic Peninsula that empty into Hood Canal are in much better shape from a freshwater habitat perspective. And that encourages a broader analysis of actions and conditions beyond freshwater habitat – including hatcheries, harvest and saltwater survival – to determine steps that can be taken in those areas to restore naturally self-sustaining salmon and steelhead populations. |
Decisions about which “dials to turn,” and in what sequence, must be informed by the best available science and designed to test hypotheses about the primary factors limiting wild salmon recovery along Hood Canal.
Too often in the highly politicized world of salmon management, such essential scientific inquiries have not been conducted, or, when they have been conducted, the study results have not been fully expressed in management actions. Such political impediments must be avoided, and the best way to do that is by ensuring a transparent decision-making process in which the stakeholders and managers are engaged together in fact-finding and scientific inquiry.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Joy Waltermire, Steelhead Biologist, Long Live the Kings: The opportunity for success in Hood Canal lies in looking at recovery through a wide-angle and non‐traditional lens. Ideally, we can transform the Canal into a permanent sanctuary for both people and fish where natural functions are sustained and protected. By taking a fresh look and implementing holistic recovery projects comprised of new and alternative approaches, salmon recovery can be achieved and sustained. |
The challenge, and also the key, to making a lasting recovery will be to evaluate all elements affecting our salmon, including re‐balancing the food chain, refining fisheries and hatchery management practices, rehabilitating in‐stream habitat and redefining our human involvement and engagement.
Click to expand and read the full response
What will it take for current salmon and steelhead recovery efforts in the Canal to work?
![]() |
Phil Johnson, Commissioner, Jefferson County:
From my view, recovery efforts will work if they are seen by the community of the surrounding counties as an |
I was a commercial fisherman for 12 years—from 1972-1984—and at the beginning, a fisherman could do really well here. In the 1970s, the docks were vibrant and alive with people. Fishing was a huge industry. Today, it is difficult to convince many people that salmon recovery is a part of economic development. People have to see this kind of activity again. If they see the fish returning; if they are given more fishing opportunities as a result; and if both the fishermen and all of the ancillary businesses that profit on commercial fishing are making money, then they will understand the link between more salmon and economic recovery.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Joseph Pavel, Natural Resources Director, Skokomish Tribe: People need to be made aware of lifestyle choices and land use practices that will eventually make a difference in recovery success potential. The cumulative impacts that have been the cause of salmonid population declines will need to be dealt with by multiple strategies and efforts that will, in turn, cumulatively contribute to the recovery of habitats and populations. |
![]() |
Neil Werner, Executive Director, Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group: The work in Hood Canal has been, to my thinking, ahead of the rest of the state in its efforts to restore habitat, but it is not where it should be in the supplementation of salmonid numbers. We are governed by antiquated laws based on harvest first and foremost and that has never worked effectively anywhere. When mankind is left to manage a resource with economic goals as its most important parameter, you can be sure it, and the resource, will fail. We need to look at Hood Canal differently than the rest of the state, and look in different arenas for answers other than the status quo we now suffer through. |
Certainly we are moving toward this end by working together, collaborating, coordinating and building partnerships based on the best interest of the resource. I feel that our best opportunity to make real strides toward a Hood Canal as a place teeming with life and natural beauty is through forming strong and effective partnerships that have the strength and backing to challenge those who currently are in place that make decisions for us, but not necessarily with us.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Larry Telles, Biologist and Member of the Pacific Region Hatchery Review Team, US Fish and Wildlife Service: It will take a united community effort to achieve any meaningful recovery in the Canal. The multi-agency effort on the ground is the seed that can only blossom in a healthy watershed. The temptation to rely on hatchery propagation to sustain these salmonid populations should be avoided at all costs. In my opinion, using hatcheries to endlessly supply fish unrealistically allows us to “have our cake and eat it too” by masking continuous insult to habitat without an apparent decrease in numbers of fish. The price we pay in genetic and ecological terms is enormous though, and could actually damage the very resource we seek to protect. |
![]() |
Joy Waltermire, Steelhead Biologist, Long Live the Kings: In order for salmon recovery efforts to be effective in Hood Canal, the richness and complexity of the food chain must be re-established. Once abundant in the Canal, populations of sardines are now gone, and Pacific herring have declined as well. I believe we need to understand what has happened to our feeder fish populations and restore balance to the food chain in order to ensure that other recovery efforts are effective. |
Additionally, we should more strongly consider the benefits of salmon population diversity in our recovery and long-term management efforts. For example, regions with salmon populations that exit and return to rivers at various times throughout the year may be less susceptible to ecosystem changes (e.g. to climate, predator or prey abundance, water availability, etc.) than regions with populations that predominantly return at one time of the year. For Hood Canal, restoring spring-run Chinook to some systems could provide a survival hedge against ecosystem changes for the Chinook population as a whole (currently all fall run), and restoring the historic “Christmas chum” or late‐March coho runs could ensure there are an abundance of available nutrients for rearing juveniles of all species.
The salmon restoration community in Hood Canal should also continue to evaluate current approaches to habitat recovery. For example, many rivers in the Canal suffer from accumulations of excess gravel. As sediment laden runoff and gravel has accumulated in the rivers, it prevents salmon from accessing healthy spawning grounds and fills in pools and eliminates riffles salmon need for rearing. This gravel may need to be directly removed in order to restore river health in time to save severely depleted salmon stocks.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Dick Burge, Vice President of Conservation, Wild Steelhead Coalition: Wild fish habitat should be restored to conditions that early settlers found before the saw, the plough, in-river and streamside development, multiple pollutants and other damaging activities invaded the watersheds and marine waters of Hood Canal. These activities collectively removed much of the protective and rearing properties of the rivers and estuaries. Our collective concept of healthy wild fish habitat is badly skewed by what we observe today; a badly damaged habitat that seems natural and productive to us, given that it has been in this condition for over a century. |
Although most Hood Canal Peninsula rivers have escaped some of the destructive anthropogenic forces that have occurred in other Pacific Northwest areas, such as dams and streamside construction, past timber management practices have badly damaged the forest ecosystem, and present logging practices continue that destruction. As global warming increases over this century, those impacts will (be compounded), causing larger winter floods, lower summer and fall stream flows and increased stream temperatures. These conditions will further degrade the productive capacity of Hood Canal rivers. Restoring and protecting the complete array of wild fish habitats and their associated ecosystem components is the only chance we have to prevent extinction of wild salmonids from existing anthromorphic activities and changing environmental conditions.
Possibly the only way to accomplish habitat and ecosystem restoration is to preserve broad corridors along these rivers through one of several governmental acts or private organizations similar to the preservation of wild fish ecosystems along the Queets (National Parks) and Hoh Rivers (The Hoh River Trust).
Click to expand and read the full response
How can we, as non-profits, landowners, business people, fishers, tribal members, scientists, agency staff, and citizens, ensure that salmon recovery in Hood Canal is supported and effective?
![]() |
Phil Johnson, Commissioner, Jefferson County: The opportunities to recover salmon in the Canal are great. We have a huge number of organizations and individuals who are stepping forward to provide resources and energy in that direction. It is going to require a lot of hard work, not only by the groups already here, but by individuals, policy makers, and funders on and off the Canal. |
The Hood Canal Coordinating Council plays an integral role. The council authored the Summer Chum Recovery Plan, which has been adopted by the State and NOAA, and is the regional salmon recovery organization. As the lead entity for salmon recovery, the Council coordinates funding for projects. It created the Community Near Shore Restoration Project and the Marine Riparian Initiative to work with citizens to create habitat-friendly shoreline through indigenous vegetation and soft armoring. The Council is presently in the final stages of writing the Hood Canal Watershed Management Plan. The Hood Canal Coordinating Council also supports the Shorebank Cascadia Septic Loan Program.
State Parks are stepping up to reduce nitrogen input by installing sewage treatment in Potlatch State Park, which will also serve part of the Skokomish needs, as well as designing a system for Dosewallips State Park, which will potentially serve part of Brinnon.
As part of that stewardship, Jefferson County has recently adopted its updated Shoreline Master Plan which is respondent to best available science. The plan is presently being reviewed by the Department of Ecology for their approval.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Joseph Pavel, Natural Resources Director, Skokomish Tribe: We all need to be working together to collect and share the information that will guide us toward the development of successful recovery strategies. These strategies need to be effectively communicated with compelling information that will enable us to gain support for the necessary funding, appropriate regulatory environment, and personal voluntary commitment. |
We need to reinforce to the public that the quality of life that has brought people to this part of the country can only be sustained by a deliberate and committed effort, and that we all have a shared responsibility to maintain, restore, and enhance the natural resources we all treasure.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Larry Telles, Biologist and Member of the Pacific Region Hatchery Review Team, US Fish and Wildlife Service: We need to work together to protect and husband all of our natural resources in order to continue to enjoy their bounty and assure that we are bestowing the same beautiful area in which we live to our children. Remember, our rivers and streams reflect all the good and bad in our watersheds because they are the “drains” that receive water from top to bottom in those watersheds. When we manage the land in our watersheds intelligently, we can maintain the health of those rivers and streams and, by extension, the life in those watercourses. |
![]() |
Rob Masonis, Vice President for Western Conservation, Trout Unlimited: The importance of transparency and objectivity in salmon recovery decision-making cannot be overstated, because it is how trust is built among the various interests and communities that will ultimately determine the success of salmon recovery efforts along Hood Canal and beyond. |
While we have made much progress, first under Shared Strategy and now under the Puget Sound Partnership, we’re not there yet. Lingering distrust and suspicion threatens the entire salmon recovery enterprise, including the enormous public and private investment in habitat protection and restoration made to date.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Joy Waltermire, Steelhead Biologist, Long Live the Kings: We must maintain a focus on the needs of wild fish as we continue work to improve harvest and hatchery management. The current system attempts to balance production and harvest with the needs of endangered and threatened salmon species, but more could be done to foster recovery of a broader diversity of salmon. Long Live the Kings is working with others to look for ways to restore the natural balance and diversity that Hood Canal salmon populations (and people) historically depended upon. |
At the minimum, we need to be working in effective partnerships to search for all ways to protect our major investments in salmon population and habitat recovery so that sustainability can be achieved.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Dick Burge, Vice President of Conservation, Wild Steelhead Coalition: Recovering wild fish stocks to healthy populations through management changes must include rebuilding the VSP parameters (i.e., abundance, diversity, productivity and distribution) toward past levels. Properties of the VSP parameters during the turn of the 19th Century are important to understand, even if they are not fully achievable; ignoring these historical parameters will assure we set our vision far too low, and rebuild/manage below what might otherwise be achievable. Following this approach, the Wild Steelhead Coalition envisions healthy populations that approach historical abundance, diversity that is allowed to rebuild to its natural genetic and habitat imposed levels, and wild fish fully occupying the productive habitat and productivity/escapement levels that meet, and at times exceed, the rivers carrying capacity for juveniles. |
The Wild Steelhead Coalition envisions a new fisheries management system for Hood Canal Rivers that is conservative and always errs on recovering and maintaining healthy wild stocks. We support this concept in terms of fisheries planning that manages for maximum juvenile production supported by existing habitat for each stock to assure maximum sustaining river and ocean abundances, instead of managing populations down to the knife edge “allowed” by mathematical harvest models.
We believe, with habitat restoration and good management, wild steelhead will return to these waters in numbers that will exceed the combination of hatchery and limited wild stocks that are continually diminished by introgression, ecological competition, and mixed stock fisheries.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Neil Werner, Executive Director, Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group: I find it interesting that if we do not have records on any particular species, river or habitat it is considered, most times, to not exist even though we have immeasurable amounts of anecdotal history. We need to marry this information along with the best available science and work with all stakeholders for the betterment of the resource. We cannot let proprietary interests lead our decision-making. We need to leave our personal interests at the door and lay all of our cards on the table and develop a strategy that, perhaps, leaves no one happy but the resource. |
What needs to happen for recovery to last?
![]() |
Rob Masonis, Vice President for Western Conservation, Trout Unlimited: What we need to succeed over the long-haul in Hood Canal and throughout the range of Pacific salmon are science-based decision-making, the willingness to make short-term sacrifices to achieve long-term benefits, and a true commitment among all key stakeholders to doing what is necessary to restore naturally self-sustaining salmon and steelhead populations. As one of Trout Unlimited’s founding fathers stated almost 50 years ago, "take care of the fish and the fishing will take care of itself". |
![]() |
Joy Waltermire, Steelhead Biologist, Long Live the Kings: Humans were originally attracted to the region’s abundant resources and opportunity, and hopefully forever will be. “We” need to redefine our future involvement and strategies and manage our resources for their intrinsic value as well as our long-term mutual benefit. |
Managers and the public must be creative and inventive in both the development and implementation of a recovery plan for Hood Canal. If we succeed, Hood Canal can be an exemplary destination exhibiting a rich history and a vibrant future of recreation, healthy shellfish and timber industries, salmon recovery and fishing. With proper facilitation and cooperation, Hood Canal’s potential economic and environmental viability can help us harmoniously redefine a sustainable future for both people and nature.
For recovery efforts to last in Hood Canal, we must offer continued support, remain committed and stay unified. Thankfully Hood Canal is supported by a passionate and committed community eager and ready to take part in its recovery, myself included.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Dick Burge, Vice President of Conservation, Wild Steelhead Coalition: For some species, as wild steelhead, we must recognize that recovery will be very difficult and productivity may be lower than that of other species of salmon. A second recognition is that these are small rivers that can easily be depleted again. A more conservative fishing approach for steelhead would include catch and release fisheries for sport fishers, limited ceremonial and subsistence harvests for the local Indian tribes, and maintaining healthy return levels that assure the maintenance of abundance, diversity, productivity and distribution (i.e. high VSP characteristics). Other salmon species may provide higher or lower harvests depending on the ability of a recovered habitat to support their production. |
![]() |
Phil Johnson, Commissioner, Jefferson County: We are making progress. We are working to preserve valuable habitat—like the proposed 90 acre expansion of Dosewallips State Park and the Tarboo Natural Area Preserve—and we have recently seen increased salmon returns in places like Salmon Creek and Jimmy Come Lately Creek. These efforts result from a lot of people, organizations, and agencies doing a lot of hard work. |
But there is a larger and less tangible need that must be addressed in order for these results to continue and expand into the future. There needs to be a fundamental change of consciousness about our natural environment. Everyone must understand that humans, the environment, and fish, all function together. If salmon become extinct, it will be a clear indication that our environment has degraded to an even greater extent.
While I do think that this progress is slowly happening, and that all progress is good progress in that regard, I still believe that we have to keep working to elevate people’s awareness around issues related to salmon, and thus to change their behavior so that their individual decisions better support recovery. To do this, education is key; creating and implementing quality education and outreach programs will require ongoing public support.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Larry Telles, Biologist and Member of the Pacific Region Hatchery Review Team, US Fish and Wildlife Service: As a people, we need to appreciate ALL the values of the place we live, and commit ourselves to protecting them, not just for ourselves, but for those who follow us. Protection does not mean locking up resources in absolute preservation. That would be unrealistic. |
We need to set aside some wild places as “reference points” if you will, but for the most part, I believe it IS possible to use the land intelligently by minimizing our impacts and asking ourselves a basic question, Did we leave this place as good or better than we found it? Conscious, cooperative commitment is what it will take to make this salmonid recovery last.
Click to expand and read the full response
![]() |
Neil Werner, Executive Director, Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group: The Mission and Vision of the Pacific Northwest Salmon Center, in its purpose it states: “Saving wild salmon for all future generations can only happen through a meaningful and perpetual educational effort. This battle will be won only if the general public genuinely understands the value of saving wild salmon and related ecosystems.” Let’s put the resource first. |
![]() |
Joseph Pavel, Natural Resources Director, Skokomish Tribe: We need to recognize that the activities that have led to the decline in salmonid populations have taken generations to manifest in a manner that has compelled us to take action. We need to know that the decline in habitat and population response may continue while we are engaged in recovery efforts and that eventual recovery may take at least as many generations to convince us that the investment we make is, and will be, worth the effort. |
Patience and resolve are necessary to maintain our commitment to recovery. Recognize that we enjoy a gift from our creator that is meant to sustain and promote the health of our mind body and spirit, a gift elegantly designed to be perpetual and self-sustaining, provided we also use the wisdom we are blessed with to make choices that respect the tenant that all life is sacred and connected.
Click to expand and read the full response
About the LLTK Roundtable
At LLTK, we routinely call upon the expertise of independent scientists, tribal and agency staff, teachers, activists, fishers, and community leaders to inspire and inform our work. The LLTK Roundtable, is an opportunity for you to enjoy the kind of access we do to inspiring leaders in salmon and steelhead recovery.
About the Participants
We'll continue to add voices to our Roundtable as the topics change. Participation in the LLTK Roundtable does not represent endorsement of all of our activities, but is critical to helping us shape them.
Suggest a Discussion Topic
Is there a topic you'd like the LLTK Roundtable to discuss?
- Send your idea to roundtable@lltk.org







